Just when we thought he couldn’t go any further against the tide of public and media thinking, especially after being the only (high-profile) person to “guarantee” a Romney debate win over Obama (while explaining “why,” scientifically), the acclaimed “Brain Doctor” has now “guaranteed” a Paul Ryan win against highly experienced and loquacious VP Biden!  And, it has nothing to do with political bias.

In case you didn’t hear, only last week the “Brain Doctor”, BTI’s founder and Director Jonathan P. Niednagel (JN), alerted the national and international media days prior to the presidential debate that he “guaranteed” a Gov. Romney win.  (Coincidently, Romney won by the largest margin ever with Gallop debate polling—52 points! It was previously held by fellow-FCIL Bill Clinton in his verbal victory over George H. Bush—#11 FCAL.)    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2214753/Mitt-Romneys-52-point-debate-victory-Obama-biggest-Gallup-poll-history.html.  Now JN is risking his reputation of consistent, predictive accuracy again with a “guaranteed” Ryan victory!  What does JN know that we don’t?  Plenty, and it’s based upon scientific and empirical fact, not wishful thinking or mere speculation.

How can JN intelligently make these radical “guarantees”?  As BT students already know, from decades of genetic, neurologic, biomechanic, and optometric research, JN positively ‘knew’ Romney’s #15 FCIL and inborn Brain Type (BT) would outperform Obama’s #13 FCIR BT under debate pressure (obviously not in everything but in very specific cerebral ways).  (See article posted 2 days BEFORE last Wednesday’s debate explaining the guaranteed win here.) http://braintypes.com/2012/10/102-guaranteed-romney-will-win-first-debate-and-why-2/.

Just a little delving into BT and JN’s 4 decades of researching inborn behavior quickly reveals ‘how’ he can make these guarantees and with remarkable accuracy.   Yet why is JN letting these things be known when he typically goes out of his way to stay under the radar?  As many know, JN has had major illness issues in recent years.   By God’s grace, however, he’s not only dodged death twice, but he’s now doing much better. Yet JN realizes his longevity is still uncertain, and with this in mind, he’s now driven to making these rare public predictions, helping the media and public not only understand but apply the revolutionary science of BT.   It is invaluable in knowing precisely why every public figure behaves as he or she does, as well as everyone around us, including our families.

As BT students know full well, nothing comes close to providing such profound insight.  BT answers all our questions about this past debate, the upcoming VP debate, and the final two presidential debates.  As long as he has breath, JN feels compelled to help us all better understand the 16 inborn, indelible BTs, and how they dictate human behavior (mentally and physically!) more than any other factors (save spiritual).  His upcoming book and DVD series will demonstrate this better than any of his previous learning materials.

In summary, according to JN, young Paul Ryan at only age 42, is “guaranteed” to win Thursday night’s debate with senior statesman, Joe Biden, age 69.  (See previous BTI debate article guaranteeing an MR victory over BO for the scientific details of how this will be possible.) After all, both MR and PR share the same inborn design, the #15 FCIL, a rare BT in national politics.  Yes, their backgrounds (nurturing) are very different, and EVERYTHING else about them is dissimilar (including physiological, biological, genetic, etc., factors), BUT the two GOPers were born with the exact same BT.  Therefore, this genetically dictates the same brain adeptness in cerebral region Q3 and #15 FCIL neural circuitry to both cognitive and motor areas.  Number-15s are the best, bar none. at articulating logic (especially conceptual) in a sequential, detailed and thoughtful manner.   This doesn’t guarantee they’re right on all matters or even most matters, but it does assure that whatever they communicate will be difficult to oppose in like, competent manner (unless the fellow combatant is also a #15. Other notable #15 FCILs have included JFK, Ronald Reagan, and Bill Clinton).

Both P. Ryan and M. Romney are of high character and excellent reputations with those whom they have worked closest, friend or foe.   Considering this, they are not spinmeisters but men convinced and well-schooled in their beliefs.  Regardless of their perspectives, they won’t be far off from accurately portraying them, causing objective audiences to be impressed.  Whereas their debate partners, Obama and Biden, master #13 FCIR circuitry which is the optimal defense lawyer, promoting doubt (if felt necessary) to everything that comes its way.   FCIRs can also astutely prosecute their beliefs, but when questioned thoroughly, they lack the #15’s capacity to be as exacting and thoroughly consistent in thought.  After all, #13s are most adroit in big-picture issues, not in details and specifics.  Undoubtedly, Biden and Obama will win in the realms of generalities and abstract thought but not consistently with point-by-point data while dissecting the issues (unless it’s a rare area they’ve studied in great detail).  FCIRs are not as convinced in their beliefs as #15s (which is sometimes good), since their dominant Right brain is usually open and searching for something new and better.

It should be fun and quite revealing once again to see the #15s and #13s try to convince audiences by their individual and inborn BTs.

Note: The views expressed may not reflect the views of BTI in its entirety.
Written by: Staff

————————————-